Facebook pixel tracking

The Science and Information (SAI) Organization publishes open-access peer-reviewed journals in computer science and artificial intelligence.

Contact Info
Website thesai.org
Follow Us
Contact Info
Follow Us
Research Article | Open Access |

Empirical Evaluation of Language Models for Arabic Financial Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study of Pretrained and General Large Language Models

Author 1: Abdullah Almusned Author 2: Mohammad Mehedi Hassan Author 3: Muhammad Al-Qurishi Author 4: Bader Alkhamees
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA) · Vol. 17, No. 9 · Published 2026

DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2026.0170992

Abstract

This study presents a comparative study on the effectiveness of large and pre-trained language models in analyzing sentiment in Arabic financial news. While sentiment analysis using AI has advanced significantly in English-language finance, similar progress in Arabic remains limited. Most existing Arabic models, such as AraBERT and CAMeLBERT, are trained on general or social media posts and struggle with domain-specific content like financial data. At the same time, modern LLMs like ChatGPT and Gemini have not been thoroughly tested on Arabic financial data. Our work addresses these gaps by evaluating five models—ChatGPT, Gemini, Nuha (an Arabic LLM), AraBERT, and CAMeLBERT—on a dataset of 10,166 financial news headlines from Argaam, a leading Saudi financial platform. We conduct three key experiments. First, we conduct a standard sentiment classification comparison across all models. Second, prompt engineering experiment using zero-shot, one-shot, and three-shot strategies. Finally, persona-driven analysis where models respond from the viewpoint of different financial roles. The results show that Nuha consistently delivers the highest performance, except when prompts include user roles. They show promising results, but did not achieve the highest performance. ChatGPT maintains stable results across prompt variations and shows the most remarkable results when there are persona-driven prompts. Gemini performs well in zero-shot but degrades with added context. PLMs underperform, highlighting the need for better domain adaptation. Overall, this study provides practical insights into model behavior under different prompting conditions, emphasizes the importance of cultural alignment, and introduces persona-driven prompting as a valuable strategy for Arabic financial sentiment analysis.

Keywords

How to Cite this Article

Almusned, A., Hassan, M. M., Al-Qurishi, M., & Alkhamees, B. (2026). Empirical Evaluation of Language Models for Arabic Financial Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study of Pretrained and General Large Language Models. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 17(9). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2026.0170992

Almusned, Abdullah, et al.. "Empirical Evaluation of Language Models for Arabic Financial Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study of Pretrained and General Large Language Models." International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 17, no. 9, 2026, https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2026.0170992.

@article{Almusned2026,
  title     = {Empirical Evaluation of Language Models for Arabic Financial Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study of Pretrained and General Large Language Models},
  journal   = {International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications},
  volume    = {17},
  number    = {9},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {The Science and Information Organization},
  author    = {Abdullah Almusned and Mohammad Mehedi Hassan and Muhammad Al-Qurishi and Bader Alkhamees},
  doi       = {10.14569/IJACSA.2026.0170992},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2026.0170992}
}

Open Access — licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, even commercially, as long as the original work is properly cited.

Call for Papers - Important Dates

Volume 17 No. 11, November 2026
Paper Submission Due October 25, 2026
Review Notification November 15, 2026
Publication Date November 30, 2026